下饭剧指南 · 2026-10-29 03:37:55
【】

Alright, let's go step-by-step.
We are told: ( 970xy ) is a 5-digit number(since it's written as digits concatenated: 9, 7, 0, x, y) and it is divisible by 12.


Step 1: Interpret the notation

( 970xy ) means the number is:
[
N = 9 \times 10000 + 7 \times 1000 + 0 \times 100 + x \times 10 + y
]
[
N = 90000 + 7000 + 0 + 10x + y
]
[
N = 97000 + 10x + y
]
where ( x ) and ( y ) are digits, ( 0 \le x \le 9 ), ( 0 \le y \le 9 ).
Step 2: Divisibility by 12
A number divisible by 12 must be divisible by both 3 and 4.
Step 3: Divisibility by 4 rule
A number is divisible by 4 if its last two digits form a number divisible by 4.
Here, the last two digits are ( xy ) (where ( x ) is tens digit, ( y ) units digit).
So ( 10x + y ) must be divisible by 4.
Step 4: Divisibility by 3 rule
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
Digits: ( 9, 7, 0, x, y )
Sum of digits: ( 9 + 7 + 0 + x + y = 16 + x + y ).
We need ( 16 + x + y ) divisible by 3.
Step 5: Combine conditions
We have:
- ( 10x + y ) divisible by 4.
- ( 16 + x + y ) divisible by 3.
Also ( x, y ) digits, ( 0 \le x \le 9, 0 \le y \le 9 ).
Step 6: Try possible ( xy ) divisible by 4
Let’s list two-digit numbers ( 10x + y ) divisible by 4, with ( x ) possibly 0 to 9, ( y ) 0 to 9.
But ( N = 97000 + (10x + y) ), so ( 10x + y ) ranges from 0 to 99.
We can solve by checking ( 16 + x + y \equiv 0 \ (\text{mod} 3) ).
That means ( x + y \equiv 2 \ (\text{mod} 3) ), because ( 16 \equiv 1 \ (\text{mod} 3) ), so ( 1 + (x+y) \equiv 0 \Rightarrow x+y \equiv 2 \ (\text{mod} 3) ).
Step 7: List possible ( xy ) divisible by 4 and ( x+y \equiv 2 \ (\text{mod} 3) )
Let’s list ( 10x+y ) divisible by 4:
Possible endings: 00, 04, 08, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96.
Now check ( x+y \mod 3 ):
- 00: ( x=0, y=0, x+y=0 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 04: ( x=0, y=4, x+y=4 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 08: ( x=0, y=8, x+y=8 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 12: ( x=1, y=2, x+y=3 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 16: ( x=1, y=6, x+y=7 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 20: ( x=2, y=0, x+y=2 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 24: ( x=2, y=4, x+y=6 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 28: ( x=2, y=8, x+y=10 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 32: ( x=3, y=2, x+y=5 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 36: ( x=3, y=6, x+y=9 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 40: ( x=4, y=0, x+y=4 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 44: ( x=4, y=4, x+y=8 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 48: ( x=4, y=8, x+y=12 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 52: ( x=5, y=2, x+y=7 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 56: ( x=5, y=6, x+y=11 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 60: ( x=6, y=0, x+y=6 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 64: ( x=6, y=4, x+y=10 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 68: ( x=6, y=8, x+y=14 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 72: ( x=7, y=2, x+y=9 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 76: ( x=7, y=6, x+y=13 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 80: ( x=8, y=0, x+y=8 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 84: ( x=8, y=4, x+y=12 \equiv 0 ) → no.
- 88: ( x=8, y=8, x+y=16 \equiv 1 ) → no.
- 92: ( x=9, y=2, x+y=11 \equiv 2 ) → yes.
- 96: ( x=9, y=6, x+y=15 \equiv 0 ) → no.
Step 8: Valid ( xy ) values
So possible ( xy ) are: 08, 20, 32, 44, 56, 68, 80, 92.
That means ( (x, y) ) = (0,8), (2,0), (3,2), (4,4), (5,6), (6,8), (8,0), (9,2).
Step 9: Check if any other constraints
No, just divisibility by 12. So all these 8 possibilities work.
Step 10: Possibly the problem wants the number of solutions or specific one
If the problem is just “find all possible ( 970xy ) divisible by 12”, we list them:
- ( 97008 )
- ( 97020 )
- ( 97032 )
- ( 97044 )
- ( 97056 )
- ( 97068 )
- ( 97080 )
- ( 97092 )
Final answer (if listing numbers):
[
\boxed{97008, 97020, 97032, 97044, 97056, 97068, 97080, 97092}
]
If they asked for how manysuch numbers, it’s ( \mathbf{8} ).
追问
这一页是什么?
星屑棋盘用方块、对话框和计分条,不用现成游戏角色。
图从哪里来?
大图由后台图库提供。
一对一聊天软件
匿名性悖论:一对一聊天软件中表达自由的双重构塑——基于去个体化理论与自我呈现理论的交叉分析一、研究背景与理论框架随着移动互联网技术的演进,一对一匿名聊天软件如早期Kik、Telegram秘密聊天及部分
ssrpeach
SSRPeach网络加速工具深度评测在当今对稳定高效网络连接需求日益增长的背景下,SSRPeach作为一款集成ShadowsocksR核心技术的网络优化工具,逐渐进入了资深用户的视野。本文旨在对其进行
su7吃瓜
SU7吃瓜:高效聚合热点,定义新一代社交化资讯体验在信息爆炸的时代,如何快速、精准地获取并参与热点话题讨论,成为众多用户的痛点。SU7吃瓜应运而生,它并非一款汽车产品,而是一款专注于社会热点、娱乐事件
